Case report: Headache as the sole neurological symptom in autoimmune glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) astrocytopathy.

Autoimmune glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) astrocytopathy is a recently emerging autoimmune disease of the central nervous system (CNS); GFAP astrocytopathy is characterized by optic neuritis and meningoencephalomyelitis. We report the case of a 55-year-old man, otherwise healthy, who presented with isolated headaches for three months, without other features of meningoencephalitis or myelitis. His neurological examination and fundoscopy were unremarkable. Gadolinium-enhanced brain MRI demonstrated increased T2 hyperintensity within the right sub-lenticular basal ganglia, with additional leptomeningeal enhancement along the bilateral perisylvian regions and mesial temporal lobes. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis showed lymphocytic pleocytosis, elevated protein, matching oligoclonal bands, and a negative infectious and cytological workup. Cell-based assays for anti-aquaporin-4, anti-myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein, autoimmune encephalitis panel, and vasculitis workup were all negative, except for CSF positivity for GFAP α antibody. Oncological screening, including CT of the chest, abdomen, pelvis, and scrotal US, was unremarkable. Immunotherapy with high-dose intravenous steroids for five days and subsequent single four-weekly doses resulted in the resolution of both clinical and radiographic features, with a maintained status 24 months after onset. This case highlights isolated headache and basal ganglia, mesial temporal lobe involvement as a rare presentation of autoimmune GFAP astrocytopathy.

Antibodies to neural cell surface and synaptic proteins in paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes.

Among patients with paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes (PNS), emphasis has historically been placed on neural antibodies against intracellular proteins that have a strong association with malignancy. Because of the intracellular location of their antigenic targets, these antibodies are typically considered to be non-pathogenic surrogate markers of immune cell-mediated neural injury. Unfortunately, patients with these antibodies often have suboptimal response to immunotherapy and poor prognosis. Over the last two decades, however, dramatic advancements have been made in the discovery and clinical characterization of neural antibodies against extracellular targets. These antibodies are generally considered to be pathogenic, given their potential to directly alter antigen structure or function, and patients with these antibodies often respond favorably to prompt immunotherapy. These antibodies also associate with tumors and may thus occur as PNS, albeit more variably than neural antibodies against intracellular targets. The updated 2021 PNS diagnostic criteria, which classifies antibodies as high-risk, intermediate-risk, or lower-risk for an associated cancer, better clarifies how neural antibodies against extracellular targets relate to PNS. Using this recently created framework, the clinical presentations, ancillary test findings, oncologic associations, and treatment responses of syndromes associated with these antibodies are discussed.

Optimizing the diagnostic performance of neural antibody testing for paraneoplastic and autoimmune encephalitis in clinical practice.

The detection of neural antibodies in patients with paraneoplastic and autoimmune encephalitis has majorly advanced the diagnosis and management of neural antibody-associated diseases. Although testing for these antibodies has historically been restricted to specialized centers, assay commercialization has made this testing available to clinical chemistry laboratories worldwide. This improved test accessibility has led to reduced turnaround time and expedited diagnosis, which are beneficial to patient care. However, as the utilization of these assays has increased, so too has the need to evaluate how they perform in the clinical setting. In this chapter, we discuss assays for neural antibody detection that are in routine use, draw attention to their limitations and provide strategies to help clinicians and laboratorians overcome them, all with the aim of optimizing neural antibody testing for paraneoplastic and autoimmune encephalitis in clinical practice.

Canadian Consensus Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Autoimmune Encephalitis in Adults.

Autoimmune encephalitis is increasingly recognized as a neurologic cause of acute mental status changes with similar prevalence to infectious encephalitis. Despite rising awareness, approaches to diagnosis remain inconsistent and evidence for optimal treatment is limited. The following Canadian guidelines represent a consensus and evidence (where available) based approach to both the diagnosis and treatment of adult patients with autoimmune encephalitis. The guidelines were developed using a modified RAND process and included input from specialists in autoimmune neurology, neuropsychiatry and infectious diseases. These guidelines are targeted at front line clinicians and were created to provide a pragmatic and practical approach to managing such patients in the acute setting.

Teaching NeuroImage: Unilateral Primary Angiitis of the CNS.

A 48-year-old woman was referred with an 18-year history of focal-onset seizures. She also reported years-long slowly progressive right-sided weakness that was corroborated on examination. Repeated brain MRIs over 15 years showed multifocal left hemispheric T2 fluid-attenuated inversion recovery-hyperintense lesions with patchy enhancement and microhemorrhages, no diffusion restriction, and a left cerebellar infarct (Figure 1, A-F). Only 2 nonspecific white matter lesions were seen contralaterally, indicating largely unihemispheric disease. Differential diagnosis included unilateral primary angiitis of the CNS (PACNS), Rasmussen encephalitis, and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease.1 Serum and CSF testing for autoimmune, infectious, and malignant etiologies and whole-body fluorodeoxyglucose-PET, whole-exome genetic sequencing, and MR vessel-wall imaging were nondiagnostic. Brain biopsy revealed vasculitis (Figure 2, A-F), and the patient was diagnosed with unilateral PACNS. Treatment with mycophenolate mofetil has been initiated. Unilateral PACNS is a rare unihemispheric disease characterized by an indolent course and seizures, recognition of which is critical to accurate diagnosis.1,2.

Non-demyelinating disorders mimicking and misdiagnosed as NMOSD: a literature review.

BACKGROUND: Differentiating neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) from its mimics is crucial to avoid misdiagnosis, especially in the absence of aquaporin-4-IgG. While multiple sclerosis (MS) and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-IgG associated disease (MOGAD) represent major and well-defined differential diagnoses, non-demyelinating NMOSD mimics remain poorly characterized. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review on PubMed/MEDLINE to identify reports of patients with non-demyelinating disorders that mimicked or were misdiagnosed as NMOSD. Three novel cases seen at the authors' institutions were also included. The characteristics of NMOSD mimics were analyzed and red flags associated with misdiagnosis identified. RESULTS: A total of 68 patients were included; 35 (52%) were female. Median age at symptoms onset was 44 (range, 1-78) years. Fifty-six (82%) patients did not fulfil the 2015 NMOSD diagnostic criteria. The clinical syndromes misinterpreted for NMOSD were myelopathy (41%), myelopathy + optic neuropathy (41%), optic neuropathy (6%), or other (12%). Alternative etiologies included genetic/metabolic disorders, neoplasms, infections, vascular disorders, spondylosis, and other immune-mediated disorders. Common red flags associated with misdiagnosis were lack of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pleocytosis (57%), lack of response to immunotherapy (55%), progressive disease course (54%), and lack of magnetic resonance imaging gadolinium enhancement (31%). Aquaporin-4-IgG positivity was detected in five patients by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (n = 2), cell-based assay (n = 2: serum, 1; CSF, 1), and non-specified assay (n = 1). CONCLUSIONS: The spectrum of NMOSD mimics is broad. Misdiagnosis frequently results from incorrect application of diagnostic criteria, in patients with multiple identifiable red flags. False aquaporin-4-IgG positivity, generally from nonspecific testing assays, may rarely contribute to misdiagnosis.

Autoimmune encephalitis misdiagnosis and mimics.

The diagnosis of autoimmune encephalitis (AE) requires reasonable exclusion of other conditions. The aim of this study is to characterize mimickers and misdiagnoses of AE, thus we performed an independent PubMed search for mimickers of AEs or patients with alternative neurological disorders misdiagnosed as AE. Fifty-eight studies with 66 patients were included. Neoplastic (n = 17), infectious (n = 15), genetic (n = 13), neurodegenerative (n = 8), and other neurological (n = 8) or systemic autoimmune (n = 5) disorders were misdiagnosed as AE. The lack of fulfillment of diagnostic criteria for AE, atypical neuroimaging findings, non-inflammatory CSF findings, non-specific autoantibody specificities and partial response to immunotherapy were major confounding factors.

Seizures in anti-Hu-associated extra-limbic encephalitis: Characterization of a unique disease manifestation.

Anti-Hu-associated neurologic autoimmunity most often occurs in the context of small cell lung cancer and typically presents with peripheral neuropathy, cerebellar ataxia, and/or limbic encephalitis. Extra-limbic encephalitis causing seizures is a rare disease manifestation, with only sparse reports in the literature. Herein we present a patient with seizures in anti-Hu-associated extra-limbic encephalitis, and review the literature for other cases to more fully characterize this entity. Among 27 patients we identified, the median age was 46 years (range: 2-69 years) and 18 of 27 (67%) were female. Focal motor seizures were most common, followed by ictal expressive speech difficulty. Seizure semiologies along with neuroimaging findings most frequently suggested the involvement of the peri-Rolandic cortex, more anterior frontal operculum, and insula, although other cortical regions were rarely affected as well. In contrast to other classical paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes, good response to treatment with attainment of seizure-free survival was often reported, although over one-third still died. A propensity for chronic seizures among children indicated the potential to develop autoimmune-associated epilepsy. The predilection for certain extra-limbic regions, as well as the possibility of good response to treatment, may reflect unique disease mechanisms that would benefit from further study.

Pearls & Oy-sters: Gait Instability, Jaw Dystonia, and Horizontal Diplopia in a Woman With Anti-Ri Antibodies and Breast Cancer.

A 40-year-old woman was admitted for six months of progressive gait disturbance, lower limb-predominant weakness, stiffness, falls, jaw dystonia, horizontal diplopia, and weight loss. Neurological examination revealed horizontal gaze paresis, limited jaw opening with palpable masseter hypertrophy, and spastic paraparesis with sustained clonus and upgoing plantar responses. MRI revealed T2-hyperintense signal abnormalities in dorsal pons, medulla and upper cervical cord central grey matter extending to C3, without gadolinium enhancement. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) showed mildly elevated protein and immunoglobulin (IgG) index with CSF-specific oligoclonal bands. Neural autoantibody testing was positive for anti-Ri in CSF and serum by mouse brain indirect immunofluorescence and immunoblot. Testing for aquaporin 4 (AQP4)-IgG and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG)-IgG by cell-based assay were negative. The patient received methylprednisolone 1 gram for 5 days and intravenous immunoglobulin 2 grams/kilogram over 2 days with prednisone taper, and botulinum toxin injections for jaw dystonia. PET-CT revealed an enlarged left axillary lymph node with high FDG uptake. Left axillary lymph node biopsy confirmed high-grade, locally invasive breast adenocarcinoma. Neurologic stabilization was documented at two-week follow-up after hospital discharge before modified radical mastectomy. Our case demonstrates a clinical triad highly suggestive of anti-Ri-associated paraneoplastic neurologic syndrome (Ri-PNS): gait instability, jaw dystonia, and horizontal gaze paresis. The more slowly progressive course and poor response to immunotherapy help distinguish it from AQP4-IgG seropositive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) and MOG-IgG associated disease that share similar radiographic features. Early diagnosis, prompt immunotherapy and cancer treatment are paramount for disease stabilization.

Comparison of fixed cell-based assay to radioimmunoprecipitation assay for acetylcholine receptor antibody detection in myasthenia gravis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare specificity and sensitivity of a commercially available fixed cell-based assay (F-CBA) to radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) for acetylcholine receptor antibody (anti-AChR) detection in myasthenia gravis (MG). METHODS: In this retrospective diagnostic cohort study we reviewed the clinical information of suspected MG patients evaluated at the London Health Sciences Centre MG clinic who had anti-AChR RIPA and then F-CBA performed, in order to classify them as MG or non-MG. Classification of each patient as anti-AChR F-CBA-negative/positive, RIPA-negative/positive, and MG/non-MG permitted specificity and sensitivity calculations for each assay. RESULTS: Six-hundred-eighteen patients were included in study analysis. The median patient age at time of sample collection was 45.8 years (range: 7.5-87.5 years) and 312/618 (50.5%) were female. Of 618 patients, 395 (63.9%) were classified as MG. Specificity of both F-CBA and RIPA was excellent (99.6% vs. 100%, P > 0.99). One F-CBA-positive patient was classified as non-MG, although in retrospect ocular MG with functional overlay was challenging to exclude. Sensitivity of F-CBA was significantly higher than RIPA (76.7% vs. 72.7%, P = 0.002). Overall, 20/97 (21%) otherwise seronegative MG (SNMG) patients after RIPA evaluation had anti-AChR detected by F-CBA. CONCLUSIONS: In our study anti-AChR F-CBA and RIPA both had excellent specificity, while F-CBA had 4% higher sensitivity for MG and detected anti-AChR in 21% of SNMG patients. Our findings indicate that F-CBA is a viable alternative to RIPA for anti-AChR detection. Prospective studies comparing F-CBA, RIPA and L-CBA are needed to determine optimal anti-AChR testing algorithms in MG.

Positive Predictive Value of Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein Autoantibody Testing.

Importance: Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-IgG1-associated disorder (MOGAD) is a distinct central nervous system-demyelinating disease. Positive results on MOG-IgG1 testing by live cell-based assays can confirm a MOGAD diagnosis, but false-positive results may occur. Objective: To determine the positive predictive value (PPV) of MOG-IgG1 testing in a tertiary referral center. Design, Setting, and Participants: This diagnostic study was conducted over 2 years, from January 1, 2018, through December 31, 2019. Patients in the Mayo Clinic who were consecutively tested for MOG-IgG1 by live cell-based flow cytometry during their diagnostic workup were included. Patients without research authorization were excluded. Main Outcomes and Measures: Medical records of patients who were tested were initially reviewed by 2 investigators blinded to MOG-IgG1 serostatus, and pretest probability was classified as high or low (suggestive of MOGAD or not). Testing of MOG-IgG1 used a live-cell fluorescence-activated cell-sorting assay; an IgG binding index value of 2.5 or more with an end titer of 1:20 or more was considered positive. Cases positive for MOG-IgG1 were independently designated by 2 neurologists as true-positive or false-positive results at last follow-up, based on current international recommendations on diagnosis or identification of alternative diagnoses; consensus was reached for cases in which disagreement existed. Results: A total of 1617 patients were tested, and 357 were excluded. Among 1260 included patients tested over 2 years, the median (range) age at testing was 46 (0-98) years, and 792 patients were female (62.9%). A total of 92 of 1260 (7.3%) were positive for MOG-IgG1. Twenty-six results (28%) were designated as false positive by the 2 raters, with an overall agreement on 91 of 92 cases (99%) for true and false positivity. Alternative diagnoses included multiple sclerosis (n = 11), infarction (n = 3), B12 deficiency (n = 2), neoplasia (n = 2), genetically confirmed adrenomyeloneuropathy (n = 1), and other conditions (n = 7). The overall PPV (number of true-positive results/total positive results) was 72% (95% CI, 62%-80%) and titer dependent (PPVs: 1:1000, 100%; 1:100, 82%; 1:20-40, 51%). The median titer was higher with true-positive results (1:100 [range, 1:20-1:10000]) than false-positive results (1:40 [range, 1:20-1:100]; P < .001). The PPV was higher for children (94% [95% CI, 72%-99%]) vs adults (67% [95% CI, 56%-77%]) and patients with high pretest probability (85% [95% CI, 76%-92%]) vs low pretest probability (12% [95% CI, 3%-34%]). The specificity of MOG-IgG1 testing was 97.8%. Conclusions and Relevance: This study confirms MOG-IgG1 as a highly specific biomarker for MOGAD, but when using a cutoff of 1:20, it has a low PPV of 72%. Caution is advised in the interpretation of low titers among patients with atypical phenotypes, because ordering MOG-IgG1 in low pretest probability situations will increase the proportion of false-positive results.

Neural Antibody Testing for Autoimmune Encephalitis: A Canadian Single-Centre Experience.

Neural antibodies have emerged as useful biomarkers in suspected autoimmune encephalitis. We reviewed results of neural antibody testing (anti-N-methyl D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR), leucine-rich glioma-inactivated protein (LGI1), contactin-associated protein-like 2 (CASPR2), α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor (AMPAR), γ-aminobutyric acid type B receptor (GABA(B)R), dipeptidyl-peptidase-like protein-6 (DPPX), IgLON family member 5 (IgLON5) and glutamic acid decarboxylase-65 (GAD65)) using cell-based assays (CBAs) and tissue indirect immunofluorescence (TIIF) at our centre. Our findings suggest increased clinical sensitivity of CBA compared to TIIF. However, this may come at some expense to clinical specificity, as evidenced by possible false-positive results when weak serum positivity by CBA was observed for certain antibodies (i.e. anti-NMDAR, CASPR2). In such cases, correlation with serum TIIF, as well as CSF CBA and TIIF, aids in identifying true-positive results.